Addressing Poverty in Punjab: Strategies for Change

Poverty remains a persistent challenge across the globe, with developing regions such as Africa and South Asia being particularly hard hit. In Pakistan, poverty is especially acute in Punjab, the largest province that is home to more than half of the country’s population. Addressing this issue requires a detailed understanding of the factors driving poverty and the regional disparities within the province. The current study explores poverty in Punjab using data from the Multiple Cluster Indicator Survey (2017-18), applying a modified Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) to measure poverty at both divisional and district levels, with an emphasis on the rural-urban divide. The findings not only highlight the extent of poverty in Punjab but also offer actionable recommendations for targeted poverty alleviation efforts.

Understanding Poverty in Punjab: A Multidimensional Approach

Poverty is not a singular or uniform concept; it is a multidimensional issue that encompasses various aspects of human life, including education, healthcare, living standards, and overall well-being. In Punjab, the modified Alkire and Foster MPI was employed to capture these dimensions of poverty comprehensively. The MPI considers a range of indicators, such as years of schooling, child mortality, access to clean drinking water, sanitation and electricity, to provide a holistic picture of poverty.

The study finds that 21.04% of Punjab’s population lives in multidimensional poverty, with significant regional disparities. This figure is alarming, considering the province's role as the economic and cultural hub of Pakistan. The southern divisions of Bahawalpur and Dera Ghazi Khan emerged as the most affected areas, with poverty rates of 26.54% and 22.96%, respectively. In contrast, the Gujranwala division reported the lowest poverty rate at 18.16% in Punjab. This stark contrast between regions underscores the need for tailored poverty alleviation strategies that address the specific needs of each area.

Geographic Disparities in Poverty: Rural vs. Urban Divide

One of the key findings of the study is the significant disparity between rural and urban areas in Punjab. Rural areas generally suffer from higher levels of poverty compared to their urban counterparts. However, there are notable exceptions, such as urban Faisalabad, where poverty rates are higher than in the surrounding rural areas. This anomaly can be attributed to the massive migration from rural areas to urban centers, where migrants often end up living in overcrowded slums with inadequate access to health and educational facilities.

For example, in urban Faisalabad, the influx of migrants seeking better economic opportunities has led to the proliferation of slums. These areas are characterized by poor living conditions, including overcrowding, lack of clean water, inadequate sanitation, and limited access to healthcare and education. This situation highlights the complexity of poverty in urban settings, where economic opportunities coexist with significant deprivation.

Poverty Mapping: A Tool for Targeted Interventions

To better understand the spatial distribution of poverty in Punjab, the study employed Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to create detailed poverty maps. These maps provide a visual representation of poverty intensity across the province, with red areas indicating the poorest regions and pale yellow areas representing relatively better-off regions. These maps are invaluable for policymakers and NGOs, as they highlight the areas that require immediate attention and targeted interventions.

For instance, the poverty maps reveal that the southern divisions of Bahawalpur and Dera Ghazi Khan shown by red areas are poverty hotspots. These regions, characterized by arid lands and limited economic opportunities, require urgent interventions in the form of infrastructure development, improved access to education and healthcare, and livelihood support programs. In contrast, the Gujranwala division represented by pale yellow area, with its relatively low poverty rate, may benefit more from policies aimed at sustaining economic growth and preventing future poverty. Whereas the divisions of Sargodha, Multan, Lahore and Faisalabad have relatively lower level of poverty as compared to southern Punjab and relatively higher poverty rate in comparison with Gujranawala.

Root Causes of Poverty: Identifying Key Drivers

The study identified (identifies) several key drivers of poverty in Punjab, which are crucial for developing effective poverty alleviation strategies. These drivers include:

1. Education

Access to education emerged as one of the most significant predictors of poverty. The study finds that regions with lower educational attainment levels tend to have higher poverty rates. For example, Bahawalpur, one of the poorest divisions, has low enrollment rates and high dropout rates, particularly among girls. This lack of educational opportunities perpetuates the cycle of poverty; as uneducated individuals are less likely to secure well-paying jobs or improve their living standards.

To address this issue, the government and NGOs should focus on increasing access to education in impoverished areas. This can be achieved by building more schools, providing scholarships to underprivileged students, and implementing programs to reduce dropout rates, especially among girls. For instance, the Punjab government should introduce conditional cash transfer programs that provide financial incentives to families who keep their children, particularly girls, in school.

2. Healthcare

Access to healthcare services is another critical factor influencing poverty levels in Punjab. The study finds that regions such as Sahiwal and Bahawalpur, which have limited healthcare facilities, also have high poverty rates. Inadequate healthcare not only affects individuals’ ability to work and earn a livelihood but also leads to higher mortality rates and lower overall well-being.

Improving healthcare access in poverty-stricken areas should be a priority. This can be done by expanding healthcare infrastructure, training more healthcare professionals, and ensuring that basic healthcare services are available even in remote areas by providing special allowance or some other incentives to medical workers. Mobile health clinics, for example, could be deployed in rural areas to provide essential health services, including vaccinations, maternal care, and treatment for common diseases.

3. Sanitation and Basic Amenities

The study also highlights the lack of basic amenities, such as clean water, sanitation facilities, and reliable energy sources for both cooking and heating, as significant contributors to poverty. Regions like Bahawalpur, Dera Ghazi Khan, and Rawalpindi are particularly affected by poor sanitation, which is closely linked to high poverty rates.

To address the lack of basic amenities, the government should launch a comprehensive rural development program focused on improving water and sanitation infrastructure. This program could include the construction of clean water wells, community latrines, and the distribution of water purification tablets in areas where access to clean water is limited. Additionally, efforts to improve energy access, such as providing subsidies for solar panels in off-grid areas, could help alleviate energy poverty.

4. Employment and Economic Opportunities

The lack of employment opportunities is a significant driver of poverty in Punjab, particularly in rural areas. The study finds that regions with limited economic activities, such as agriculture, tend to have higher poverty rates. In contrast, areas with more diverse economies, such as Gujranawala, Gujrat and Faisalabad, which has a strong industrial base, tend to have lower poverty rates.

To create more employment opportunities in poverty-stricken areas, the government should promote the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) by providing access to credit, lowering interest rate, provision of insurance, training programs, and market linkages. For example, in rural areas where agriculture is the primary source of income, the government should introduce programs that promote agricultural diversification, value-added processing, and access to markets. Additionally, vocational training programs could be implemented to equip individuals with the skills needed for employment in various sectors, such as manufacturing, services, and technology.

Policy Implications: Crafting Targeted Poverty Alleviation Strategies

The study’s findings have significant implications for poverty reduction programs in Punjab. Given the regional disparities in poverty, it is clear that a one-size-fits-all approach will not be effective. Instead, policies need to be tailored to the specific needs of different regions and communities.

1. Targeted Interventions in High-Poverty Areas

Regions like Bahawalpur and Dera Ghazi Khan, which have been identified as poverty hotspots, should be the focus of targeted interventions. These interventions could include infrastructure development, improved access to education and healthcare, and livelihood support programs. For example, the government should launch a comprehensive poverty alleviation program in Bahawalpur that includes the construction of schools, hospitals, and roads, as well as the provision of microloans to support small businesses.

2. Urban Slum Rehabilitation

Urban slums, such as those in Faisalabad, represent a unique challenge. These areas are characterized by overcrowding, poor sanitation, and inadequate access to basic services. To address poverty in urban slums, the government should implement slum rehabilitation programs that focus on improving housing, sanitation, and access to services. For example, the government should partner with private developers to construct affordable housing units in place of slums to solve the problem of overcrowding with the condition to live in and not transferable to someone else, while ensuring that the temporarily displaced residents are provided with adequate compensation and support to transition into their new homes.

3. Enhancing Economic Development in Rural Areas

Rural areas with high poverty rates require a different approach. Economic development initiatives that promote agricultural diversification, drying and preserving for home and market, value-added processing, and access to markets can help create jobs and reduce poverty in these areas. For instance, the government should introduce programs that provide farmers with access to better seeds, fertilizers, and irrigation facilities, as well as training in modern farming techniques. Additionally, efforts to improve rural infrastructure, such as roads and electricity, can help connect farmers to markets and reduce post-harvest losses.

4. Improving Social Safety Nets

The study also highlights the importance of social safety nets in reducing poverty. Programs such as the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) have been effective in providing financial assistance to the poorest households. However, there is room for improvement in terms of coverage and targeting. The government should consider expanding social safety nets to cover more households in poverty-stricken areas and ensuring that the assistance provided is sufficient to meet basic needs. The government should also revise the lists of assistance recipients regularly to avoid the leakages.

Monitoring and Evaluation: Ensuring the Effectiveness of Poverty Alleviation Efforts

Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are crucial components of any poverty alleviation strategy. The spatially disaggregated data provided by this study offers a robust baseline for tracking progress over time. By regularly updating poverty maps and monitoring changes in key indicators, policymakers can evaluate the success of their initiatives and make necessary adjustments accordingly.

1. Regular Poverty Mapping

One of the most effective tools for monitoring poverty is the regular updating of poverty maps. These maps provide a visual representation of poverty intensity across different regions and help policymakers identify areas that require urgent attention. By updating these maps on an annual or biennial basis, the government can track the impact of poverty alleviation programs and make data-driven decisions.

2. Community-Based Monitoring

Involving local communities in the monitoring process can provide valuable insights while enhancing the accountability and transparency of poverty alleviation efforts. Community-based monitoring involves training local residents to collect data on key indicators, such as access to education, healthcare, and basic amenities. This approach not only empowers communities but also ensures that the data collected is accurate and reflective of the ground realities.

3. Use of Technology in M&E

Advancements in technology, such as mobile data collection and big data analytics, can significantly enhance the effectiveness of M&E efforts. For example, mobile apps can be used to collect real-time data on household conditions, while big data analytics can help identify trends and patterns in poverty. Additionally, the use of satellite imagery and remote sensing technology can provide valuable information on infrastructure development and environmental conditions in poverty-stricken areas.

The Role of Stakeholders: Building Partnerships for Poverty Alleviation

Poverty alleviation is a complex challenge that requires the concerted efforts of multiple stakeholders, including the government, NGOs, academic institutions, and the private sector. By working together, these stakeholders can pool their resources, knowledge, and expertise to develop more effective and sustainable poverty reduction strategies.

1. Government Initiatives

The government plays a central role in poverty alleviation by providing the necessary policy framework, funding, and infrastructure. Government initiatives should focus on creating an enabling environment for poverty reduction, including the provision of basic services, the development of infrastructure, the implementation of social safety nets and to build a workable time frame work for gradual reduction in poverty.

2. NGO Involvement

NGOs are often at the forefront of poverty alleviation efforts, particularly in remote and underserved areas. These organizations can complement government efforts by providing targeted interventions, such as education programs, healthcare services, and livelihood support. For example, NGOs like The Citizens Foundation (TCF) have been successful in providing quality education to underprivileged children in rural areas of Punjab.

3. Private Sector Engagement

The private sector can contribute to poverty reduction by creating jobs, investing in infrastructure, and supporting local businesses. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives can also play a significant role in addressing poverty. For example, companies operating in Punjab could invest in community development projects, such as building schools, clinics, and clean water facilities in poverty-stricken areas.

4. Academic Institutions

Academic institutions can support poverty alleviation efforts by conducting research, providing training, and developing innovative solutions. For example, universities in Punjab could partner with the government and NGOs to conduct research on the root causes of poverty and develop evidence-based interventions. Additionally, academic institutions could offer training programs for local communities, equipping them with the skills needed to escape poverty.

Towards a Poverty-Free Punjab

Poverty in Punjab is a multifaceted issue that requires a comprehensive and targeted approach. By understanding the root causes of poverty and addressing the regional disparities, policymakers can develop effective strategies that are tailored to the specific needs of different communities. The study’s findings provide valuable insights into the spatial distribution of poverty in Punjab and highlight the importance of targeted interventions, regular monitoring, and stakeholder collaboration.

Moving forward, it is crucial to strengthen data collection efforts, particularly in remote and disadvantaged areas, and to involve local communities in the monitoring process. By leveraging technology and building partnerships with NGOs, the private sector, and academic institutions, the government can develop more effective and sustainable poverty reduction strategies.

Achieving a poverty-free Punjab will require continuous efforts, adaptive policymaking, and a commitment to social justice and equity. However, with the right strategies in place and the concerted efforts of all stakeholders, it is possible to reduce poverty significantly and improve the quality of life for millions of people in Punjab.

Please note that the views expressed in this article are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any organization.

Muhammad Ilyas is a PhD Scholar at the Institute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.

Related Stories