Biofuels: Key to Decarbonization & Cleaner Energy

Biofuels, produced from crops, algae, and waste biomass, are emerging as a cornerstone in the global effort to decarbonize transportation, especially in hard-to-abate sectors like aviation, where Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is gaining traction, and heavy freight, which relies on high-density energy sources. With oil prices fluctuating between $75 and $90 per barrel in 2024, biofuels present an opportunity for enhanced energy security by reducing dependence on fossil fuel imports. However, their adoption comes with critical challenges, including high production costs, competition for agricultural land, and varying greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential depending on feedstock and production methods.

Globally, biofuels accounted for 4.3% of transport fuel demand in 2023 (IEA, 2024), underpinned by strong policy mandates and technological advancements. Total production reached 186 billion liters, with ethanol, primarily from sugarcane and corn, representing 64%, and biodiesel largely from vegetable oils and waste fats making up 29% (REN21, 2024). Yet, the “food versus fuel” debate remains contentious, as 40% of U.S. corn and 50% of EU rapeseed oil are diverted to biofuel production (FAO, 2024), raising concerns about food price inflation and land-use pressures.

Advanced biofuels, derived from non-food feedstocks such as agricultural residues, municipal waste, and algae, offer a more sustainable pathway by reducing land competition. These second- and third-generation biofuels are expanding their market share but face high production costs estimated at $1.50–$3.00 per liter compared to conventional fossil fuels (IRENA, 2024).

Policy support is shaping the sector’s trajectory. The EU’s Renewable Energy Directive III (RED III) mandates a 29% share of renewables in transport by 2030, while the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act extends tax credits for low-carbon fuels. The interplay between policy incentives, technological breakthroughs, and sustainable resource management will determine whether biofuels can scale up without compromising global food security or environmental integrity.

Biofuel Generations: Technological and Economic Comparison

The evolution of biofuel technology can be categorized into four distinct generations, each representing a step forward in feedstock innovation, production efficiency, and environmental sustainability. First-generation biofuels, derived from food crops such as corn, sugarcane, and soy, are the most commercially mature and widely deployed. They benefit from established supply chains and lower production costs, typically between $0.50 and $0.80 per liter, making them competitive in many markets. However, their reliance on edible crops intensifies the “food versus fuel” debate, as they compete directly with food supply chains, potentially driving up food prices and straining agricultural resources.

Second-generation biofuels shift focus to non-food biomass, including agricultural residues, forestry waste, and dedicated energy crops like switchgrass. These feedstocks reduce direct competition with food systems and offer lower land-use impacts. Nonetheless, the complexity of breaking down lignocellulosic material into fermentable sugars results in higher production costs, averaging $1.20 to $2.00 per liter. While commercial plants exist, scaling remains limited due to capital-intensive processing technologies.

Third-generation biofuels, based on algae and cyanobacteria, hold the promise of exceptionally high yields per acre and can be cultivated on non-arable land using saline or wastewater, thereby avoiding agricultural land conflicts altogether. Despite these advantages, current production systems face technological and scaling challenges, particularly in harvesting and lipid extraction. These constraints push costs into the $2.50 to $5.00 per liter range, making them economically uncompetitive without significant subsidies or breakthroughs in bioprocessing efficiency.

Fourth-generation biofuels are still largely in the research and development phase. Using advanced synthetic biology and direct carbon capture technologies, these processes convert CO₂ into liquid fuels with the potential for carbon-negative emissions. While they represent the most sustainable long-term solution, current costs exceed $5.00 per liter, reflecting early-stage technology maturity and limited commercialization.

The economic and environmental trajectory of biofuels will depend on accelerating technological advancements, achieving economies of scale, and integrating supportive policies that can reduce production costs while ensuring sustainability. Ultimately, a diversified portfolio of biofuel generations may be necessary to meet global decarbonization goals without undermining food security or ecosystem health.

Economic Drivers of Biofuel Production

The economics of biofuel production are shaped by a combination of feedstock costs, processing expenses, logistical challenges, and the strength of policy incentives. Feedstock prices remain a major determinant of overall competitiveness. In 2024, U.S. corn used for ethanol production averaged $210 per ton, with 40% of national corn output directed toward ethanol plants. Brazil’s sugarcane, a far more efficient ethanol feedstock, cost just $45 per ton, with 60% of its harvest dedicated to ethanol. Algae, while offering high productivity and no competition with food crops, remains prohibitively expensive at $300–$1,000 per ton of biomass, making it viable only in niche or subsidized markets.

Processing and logistics costs add another significant layer. Cellulosic ethanol facilities, designed to handle lignocellulosic residues and dedicated energy crops, require capital investments between $200 million and $500 million. Transporting biodiesel is also more expensive than fossil diesel, 20–30% higher per unit, due to its lower energy density and specialized storage needs. These economic hurdles are partially offset by targeted policy incentives. The U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), combined with Inflation Reduction Act tax credits, provides a $1 per gallon subsidy for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). The EU’s Renewable Energy Directive III mandates 29% renewable energy in transport by 2030 while banning palm oil-based biofuels, a move aimed at reducing deforestation. Brazil’s RenovaBio program supports ethanol through carbon trading credits, and India’s ambitious ethanol blending target of 20% by 2025 has spurred $6 billion in new biorefinery investments.

These economic drivers, however, have clear spillover effects on food systems. Rising biofuel demand has been linked to a 10–15% increase in global corn prices, and palm oil biodiesel expansion pushed cooking oil prices up 20% in 2023. Since 2020, over 5.7 million hectares have been diverted to biofuel crops, with Indonesia’s palm oil sector alone contributing to 2.3 million hectares of deforestation since 2010. While by-products like distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) provide valuable animal feed, they cannot fully offset the resulting food security risks, especially in regions like Sub-Saharan Africa.

From an environmental perspective, biofuels vary in their climate benefits. Sugarcane ethanol achieves the highest lifecycle CO₂ reductions (70–90%), while corn ethanol averages 40–50%. Yet, water demands for biofuel production such as the 1,500 liters required for each liter of corn ethanol along with biodiversity losses from feedstock expansion highlight the delicate balance between economic viability, environmental sustainability, and global food security.

Future Outlook for Biofuels (2025–2030)

The next five years are set to be transformative for the biofuel sector, with a strong emphasis on technological innovation, sustainability, and market diversification. One of the most dynamic growth areas will be Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), projected to expand tenfold by 2030 according to IATA (2024). This surge will be driven by binding decarbonization mandates in aviation, rising carbon prices, and increasing investment from both airlines and energy companies. Parallel to this, advancements in artificial intelligence for crop optimization are expected to reduce land requirements for biofuel feedstocks by as much as 20% (Nature Sustainability, 2024). Precision agriculture, predictive modeling, and real-time monitoring could enable higher yields without expanding agricultural land, thereby mitigating food-versus-fuel tensions.

On the technological frontier, 4th generation biofuels particularly e-fuels derived from captured CO₂ and renewable electricity may achieve production costs of around $2.50 per liter by 2030 (McKinsey, 2024), making them increasingly competitive with fossil-based aviation and marine fuels. However, scaling these technologies will require targeted policy support, infrastructure investment, and robust global supply chains.

To ensure that biofuel expansion aligns with climate and food security goals, several policy actions are recommended. Subsidies should be redirected toward 2nd and 3rd generation biofuels, which offer better land-use efficiency and lower lifecycle emissions. Governments must enforce strict land-use regulations to prevent deforestation and habitat loss linked to feedstock cultivation. Finally, the establishment of a global biofuel certification system, akin to the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) in forestry, could standardize sustainability criteria, improve transparency, and enhance consumer trust in renewable fuels.

Conclusion

Biofuels remain a pivotal yet complex element in the global decarbonization strategy, balancing opportunities for cleaner energy with challenges to food security, environmental sustainability, and economic viability. First-generation biofuels have provided the necessary market entry but intensified the food-versus-fuel debate, while second- and third-generation alternatives promise greater sustainability at higher costs. Fourth-generation innovations, particularly e-fuels and CO₂-to-fuel technologies, offer long-term potential for carbon-negative energy systems but require significant investment and technological breakthroughs before widespread adoption.

The economic landscape, shaped by feedstock prices, production costs, logistics, and policy incentives, continues to evolve, with governments playing a decisive role in scaling sustainable pathways. Looking ahead to 2025–2030, the biofuel sector is poised for rapid growth, driven by Sustainable Aviation Fuel, AI-enabled crop optimization, and advances in next-generation biofuels. However, success will depend on aligning technological progress with robust policy frameworks that safeguard ecosystems, protect food systems, and incentivize low-carbon innovation.

A diversified biofuel portfolio, combined with strict land-use controls and a transparent global certification system, can help ensure that biofuels contribute meaningfully to climate goals without exacerbating resource competition. The coming decade will be critical in determining whether biofuels evolve into a truly sustainable cornerstone of the global energy transition.

References: IEA; IRENA; FAO; IPCC; REN21; IATA; Nature Sustainability; McKinsey

Please note that the views expressed in this article are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any organization.

The writer is affiliated with the Institute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Related Stories