Commodity Shocks Impact on Pakistan Economy

Explore the challenges faced by Pakistan's economy between 2019 and 2025 due to global commodity shocks. Discover how COVID-19, the Ukraine war, and climate impacts have affected food security, energy prices, and the livelihoods of households and industries.

POLICY BRIEFS

Haram Fatima

3/6/2026

a person holding a bunch of coins in their hands
a person holding a bunch of coins in their hands

In the bazaars of Lahore, Karachi, and Peshawar, the story of recent years is written not in newspaper headlines but on price tags. A kilo of sugar, a liter of cooking oil, or a bag of wheat flour has quietly become a signal of deeper economic pressures shaping everyday life. For a country like Pakistan, global economic shocks rarely remain distant events. When wheat prices rise in the ports of Ukraine along the Black Sea, or when oil traders in London push crude prices upward, the effects travel rapidly through international markets and appear almost immediately in Pakistani markets, affecting household budgets and food security.

Between 2019 and 2025, global commodity markets have experienced one of the most turbulent periods in modern economic history. The outbreak of COVID-19 disrupted production, transportation, and global supply chains, leading to shortages and price spikes across many commodities. Soon after, the Russian invasion of Ukraine further destabilized global grain and energy markets, as both Russia and Ukraine are major exporters of wheat, sunflower oil, and fertilizers. At the same time, climate-related shocks including droughts, floods, and heatwaves have damaged agricultural production in several regions, tightening global food supplies and intensifying price volatility.

For Pakistan, these global disruptions have translated directly into domestic economic pressures. The country relies heavily on imported energy, palm oil, and occasionally wheat to stabilize local supply. When global prices rise, import bills surge, placing additional strain on foreign exchange reserves and fiscal balances. Higher import costs also push up domestic inflation, raising the prices of food, electricity, and transportation. As a result, households, particularly low- and middle-income families, face increasing financial stress, while industries struggle with rising production costs and energy shortages. The combined effect has been a persistent cost-of-living crisis and a challenging environment for economic stability.

Global Crises and Commodity Market Volatility

To understand Pakistan’s current economic pressures, it is essential to examine the sequence of global disruptions that reshaped international commodity markets between 2019 and 2025. What initially appeared to be a period of relative stability quickly transformed into one of the most volatile economic episodes in recent history.

In 2019, global commodity markets were generally stable. Prices for oil, wheat, and other essential goods remained moderate, allowing many importing countries including Pakistan to manage their external balances without extraordinary pressure. However, this stability proved temporary. The emergence of COVID-19 in early 2020 triggered an unprecedented disruption of global economic activity. Lockdowns halted industrial production, reduced transportation, and sharply decreased energy demand worldwide. In an extraordinary event, oil demand collapsed so dramatically that futures for West Texas Intermediate crude oil briefly traded at negative prices in April 2020. For a short period, this decline reduced Pakistan’s import costs and offered temporary relief to its balance of payments.

However, the recovery that began in 2021 brought a new set of challenges. As economies reopened, global demand for commodities surged rapidly. Supply chains that had been weakened by lockdowns, container shortages, and labor disruptions struggled to respond. Shipping delays and logistical bottlenecks pushed up the prices of key inputs such as edible oils, coal, fertilizers, and industrial metals.

The situation deteriorated further in February 2022 with the outbreak of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Both Russia and Ukraine are among the world’s leading exporters of wheat, sunflower oil, and fertilizers. The disruption of Black Sea shipping routes and the imposition of economic sanctions significantly reduced global supply, causing sharp increases in food and energy prices. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, the global Food Price Index rose dramatically during this period, reflecting widespread inflation in staple commodities.

For Pakistan, already facing fiscal constraints and declining foreign exchange reserves, these global shocks intensified inflationary pressures, weakened purchasing power, and created severe challenges for economic stabilization.

From Chicago to Karachi: How Global Prices Drive Local Inflation

The transmission of international commodity price shocks to Pakistani households operates through a complex chain of economic mechanisms, with each link amplifying the overall effect on inflation and cost of living. Research by Khan and Ahmed (2011) demonstrated that global fluctuations in oil and food prices significantly influence Pakistan's domestic inflation, interest rates, and output levels, a finding that has been reinforced by subsequent empirical studies.

The most immediate channel is the import bill. Pakistan relies heavily on imports of essential commodities such as wheat (to supplement domestic shortages), palm oil (primarily from Indonesia and Malaysia), and energy products. Even before recent crises, energy imports represented a substantial portion of total foreign expenditure. When global prices surge, the national import bill inflates sharply. In fiscal year 2022, for instance, Pakistan's current account deficit reached $17.5 billion, over 4.5% of GDP, largely due to rising costs of imported fuel and staple food items (SBP, 2023).

The pressure on foreign exchange reserves triggers another effect. As more dollars are needed to pay for imports, demand for foreign currency rises, weakening the Pakistani rupee. A depreciating rupee, in turn, makes subsequent imports costlier, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of depreciation and inflation. Econometric studies using vector autoregression models confirm the persistence and magnitude of this feedback loop (Bilqees et al., 2023).

Beyond the import channel, higher energy costs ripple across the economy. Increases in the prices of diesel, petrol, and electricity raise transportation, machinery operation, and irrigation expenses. These costs are passed along supply chains, affecting the prices of bread, vegetables, and consumer goods. Disaggregated analyses indicate that energy price shocks are the most inflationary, while food price spikes directly undermine household welfare, disproportionately impacting low- and middle-income families (Iram et al., 2021). In essence, a price surge in global markets whether in Chicago, Rotterdam, or Singapore translates almost instantly into higher household expenses in Karachi, Lahore, and Peshawar, highlighting Pakistan’s vulnerability to external shocks.

The Human Toll of Inflation: Who Bears the Burden?

Inflation in Pakistan is far from neutral; it disproportionately affects the most vulnerable segments of society, who spend a larger portion of their income on necessities such as food, fuel, and energy. During the peak of the crisis in 2023, headline inflation soared to 38%, the highest in South Asia (SBP, 2024). The Sensitive Price Indicator, which specifically tracks essential goods consumed by low-income households, revealed even steeper price increases. Cooking oil prices doubled, wheat flour, a staple in nearly every Pakistani home, became increasingly unaffordable, and the cost of energy surged sharply. According to the World Bank (2024), these combined pressures pushed an additional 5–7% of Pakistan’s population below the poverty line between 2022 and 2024. For millions of families, this meant skipping meals, withdrawing children from school, or falling into debt cycles that could take years to escape.

Industrial workers also bore a heavy brunt. Energy price shocks, as documented by Sheeraz et al. (2022), not only reduced GDP per capita but had persistent negative effects on manufacturing output. Energy-intensive sectors, particularly textiles which constitute Pakistan’s largest export industry faced skyrocketing production costs. Factories cut shifts, laid off employees, or shut down temporarily. Large-scale manufacturing contracted by over 10% at the height of the crisis, marking a period where job losses exceeded new employment creation for the first time in years.

The economic impact is uneven across sectors. Research by Bilqees et al. (2023) shows that after major oil price increases, industrial output typically declines for six to twelve months. Simultaneously, a depreciating real exchange rate reduces competitiveness in global markets. Given Pakistan’s structural trade deficit, repeated rounds of global price surges exacerbate existing economic imbalances. In sum, inflation in Pakistan is not merely a numerical statistic; it is a lived experience of hardship, pushing households, workers, and entire industries into sustained vulnerability and highlighting the urgent need for economic stabilization and social protection measures.

What Makes Pakistan So Vulnerable?

The empirical literature points to several structural factors that amplify Pakistan's susceptibility to commodity shocks. First, the country's energy mix remains heavily dependent on imported fossil fuels. When global prices spike, the economy has limited ability to substitute toward domestic alternatives in the short run (Sheeraz et al., 2022).

Second, food security remains precarious. Despite being an agricultural country, Pakistan regularly imports substantial quantities of wheat, sugar, and edible oil to meet domestic demand. This import dependence creates a direct channel for global food price transmission that hits household consumption immediately (Iram et al., 2021).

Third, weak foreign exchange reserves limit the country's ability to buffer shocks. Unlike economies with substantial reserves that can smooth out price fluctuations, Pakistan's thin reserves mean that any deterioration in the trade balance quickly translates into currency pressure and inflation (Abbasi & Hussain, 2024).

Fourth, monetary policy faces difficult tradeoffs. Research by Ahmed and colleagues (2024) highlights the two-way relationship between monetary policy and commodity prices. Contractionary policy in response to imported inflation can itself amplify output volatility, leaving policymakers with few good options.

The COVID-19 pandemic and the Ukraine war added new dimensions to this picture. Unlike previous shocks, which were often driven by a single factor (like the 1970s oil embargo), the recent crisis was multi-dimensional: demand collapse, supply disruption, war, and financial volatility all struck simultaneously. This compounded the difficulty of policy responses.

Building Resilience: Pathways for Pakistan

The pressing question for Pakistan is whether it can reduce its vulnerability to global commodity shocks and build an economy capable of withstanding external volatility. Evidence from research and policy experience points to a set of strategic directions. Energy diversification is paramount. Each dollar spent on imported oil exposes Pakistan directly to global market fluctuations. Expanding domestic energy production through solar, wind, hydro, and indigenous coal and gas can mitigate this dependence. The rapid adoption of solar tube wells in Punjab, despite environmental concerns, demonstrates the potential of decentralized renewable energy to offset imported fuel costs. Analysts argue that reducing reliance on imported energy is essential for long-term macroeconomic stability and for preventing recurrent shocks from reverberating across the economy (Sheeraz et al., 2022).

Food security requires similar attention. Investments in agricultural productivity, including higher-yield seeds, improved irrigation systems, and reduced post-harvest losses, can increase domestic production and lower dependence on imported wheat and edible oil. Strategic commodity reserves provide additional buffers against global price spikes; the 2022–2023 crisis highlighted the high costs of inadequate reserves and poorly functioning grain markets. Complementing these measures, social protection systems must be more responsive. Programs like the Benazir Income Support Program can be designed to expand automatically during crises, delivering extra cash transfers when food or fuel prices spike. Such targeted safety nets can cushion poor households from price shocks without lengthy legislative delays, as emphasized by the World Bank (2024).

Trade and macroeconomic policy are also critical. Diversifying import sources reduces exposure to geopolitical disruptions, while maintaining fiscal discipline and building foreign exchange reserves create buffers to absorb shocks. Countries with strong reserves and lower debt consistently weather commodity volatility better than those with weak fiscal space. The State Bank of Pakistan (2024) underscores that rebuilding policy room through reserve accumulation and prudent fiscal management is essential for crisis resilience.

The period from 2019 to 2025 has illustrated the harsh realities of global interdependence. Empirical research consistently shows that commodity shocks directly affect inflation, output, exchange rates, and household welfare in Pakistan (Khan & Ahmed, 2011; Iram et al., 2021; Bilqees et al., 2023). While the poor bear the brunt, the evidence also points to achievable solutions: energy and food diversification, strategic reserves, responsive safety nets, and disciplined macroeconomic policies.

The alternative repeated crises eroding living standards and increasing debts are unsustainable. Protecting households from global volatility is not a miraculous goal; it is a feasible one, but it demands sustained political will, technical competence, and a long-term strategy. If the last five years have taught anything, it is that shocks will continue. Pakistan’s future resilience depends on whether it can prepare now, before the next wave of instability arrives.

Conclusion

The experience of Pakistan between 2019 and 2025 underscores a stark reality: global commodity shocks are not distant phenomena but immediate and tangible pressures on households, industries, and the national economy. From COVID-19 disruptions to the Ukraine war, combined with climate-induced agricultural losses, the country has faced a series of intertwined crises that exposed structural vulnerabilities in energy, food security, fiscal management, and social protection systems. The poorest households have borne the heaviest burden, as soaring food and energy prices eroded purchasing power, increased poverty, and forced difficult coping strategies, including skipping meals or withdrawing children from school. At the same time, industrial sectors, particularly energy-intensive industries like textiles, have struggled with rising production costs, leading to layoffs, reduced output, and declining competitiveness in international markets.

Yet the research and policy experience suggest that Pakistan’s vulnerability is not immutable. Pathways to resilience exist diversifying energy sources, boosting domestic agricultural productivity, establishing strategic reserves, implementing responsive safety nets, diversifying trade partners, and maintaining fiscal discipline can collectively mitigate the impact of external shocks. The lessons of the past five years emphasize that resilience cannot be an afterthought; it must be built proactively through deliberate policies, investments, and institutional reforms. The alternative, repeating cycles of inflation, poverty, and economic instability, is unsustainable. Pakistan’s capacity to withstand future global shocks will depend on its ability to act decisively now, balancing immediate relief with long-term structural reform to protect households, stabilize industries, and safeguard national economic stability.

References: Abbasi & Hussain; Ahmed et al; Bilqees et al; FAO; IMF; Iram et al; Khan & Ahmed; Sheeraz eta l; SBP; World Bank.

Please note that the views expressed in this article are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any organization.

The writer is affiliated with the Institute of Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan and can be reached at hharamfatima22@gmail.com

Related Stories