Inter-Provincial Conflicts and Economic Consequences

In countries with multiple provinces or states, inter-provincial conflicts can stem from competition over resources, political power, or cultural and ethnic differences. These conflicts can have significant economic consequences, particularly when they disrupt trade, investment, and the provision of public services. Pakistan, a nation with diverse ethnicities, languages, and resources spread across its provinces, is no stranger to such conflicts. Over the years, inter-provincial tensions in Pakistan have had profound implications on the country's economy, governance, and overall stability.

Historical Context and Root Causes

Since its inception in 1947, Pakistan has grappled with inter-provincial disparities and tensions, many of which have their roots in the colonial era. The division of resources, especially water, land, and revenue, has often been a source of discord among the provinces. The centralized control exercised by successive governments in Islamabad has sometimes exacerbated these tensions, leading to feelings of marginalization and neglect, particularly in the smaller provinces of Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP).

The One Unit policy, implemented in 1955, aimed to eliminate inter-provincial rivalries by merging the provinces of West Pakistan into a single administrative unit. However, this policy was largely seen as an attempt to consolidate power in the hands of the dominant Punjab province and was met with resistance from the smaller provinces, leading to further tensions and ultimately its abandonment in 1970.

Economic Impact of Resource Conflicts

One of the most prominent examples of inter-provincial conflict in Pakistan is the ongoing dispute over the distribution of water from the Indus River system. The provinces of Punjab, Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Balochistan have long been at odds over water allocation, with Sindh and Balochistan often accusing Punjab of monopolizing water resources at the expense of downstream users. The construction of dams and barrages, such as the Kalabagh Dam, has been a particularly contentious issue, with Sindh and KP opposing the project on the grounds that it would benefit Punjab disproportionately while depriving them of their fair share of water.

The economic consequences of these disputes are significant. Agriculture, which is the backbone of Pakistan's economy and heavily reliant on irrigation, suffers immensely from inconsistent water supply. This inconsistency not only affects crop yields and food security but also leads to loss of livelihoods for millions of farmers, particularly in Sindh and Balochistan. Furthermore, the uncertainty surrounding water distribution and the frequent accusations of inequity deter investment in the agricultural sector, exacerbating poverty and underdevelopment in the affected regions.

In addition to water disputes, conflicts over natural resources such as oil, gas, and minerals have also been a source of inter-provincial tension. Balochistan, rich in natural resources, has long felt exploited by the central government and the more developed provinces, particularly Punjab. The Sui gas fields in Balochistan, discovered in the 1950s, supply a significant portion of Pakistan's natural gas needs, yet the province itself has historically received little benefit from this resource in terms of revenue sharing or infrastructure development. This perceived injustice has fueled resentment and has been one of the drivers of the ongoing insurgency in Balochistan, which has had devastating economic consequences for the province and the country as a whole.

Political Power and Ethnic Tensions

Political power dynamics and ethnic tensions also play a crucial role in inter-provincial conflicts in Pakistan. The dominance of Punjab in national politics, due to its larger population and representation in the National Assembly, has often led to accusations of neglect and discrimination by the smaller provinces. These tensions are further exacerbated by the fact that different provinces are home to distinct ethnic groups with their own languages, cultures, and political aspirations.

For instance, the Pashtun population in KP and the Baloch in Balochistan have historically felt marginalized in the political process, leading to demands for greater autonomy and control over their resources. These demands have sometimes escalated into violent conflicts, as seen in the Baloch insurgency and the militancy in KP and the former Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). The economic impact of these conflicts is severe, leading to the destruction of infrastructure, loss of investment, and the displacement of populations.

In Sindh, the urban-rural divide, coupled with the ethnic tensions between the Sindhi-speaking population and the Urdu-speaking Muhajirs (migrants from India), has led to political instability and economic disruption in Karachi, the country's largest city and economic hub. The frequent strikes, protests, and violence in Karachi have had a crippling effect on the national economy, given the city's central role in trade, industry, and finance.

Disruption of Trade and Public Services

Inter-provincial conflicts in Pakistan also disrupt trade and the provision of public services. For example, the blocking of transportation routes due to protests or strikes can lead to significant economic losses, particularly in the trade of perishable goods. The disruption of supply chains affects not only the provinces directly involved in the conflict but also the entire country, as goods and services are unable to move freely across provincial borders.

Moreover, these conflicts strain the provision of public services, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure development. Provinces engaged in disputes over resource allocation may find themselves with reduced funding for essential services, leading to a deterioration in the quality of life for their residents. This, in turn, can fuel further resentment and exacerbate existing tensions.

Potential for Escalation and Long-Term Consequences

In some cases, inter-provincial conflicts in Pakistan have the potential to escalate into violence, leading to widespread destruction and long-term economic consequences. The insurgency in Balochistan is a stark example of how unresolved grievances over resource distribution and political representation can lead to a cycle of violence and underdevelopment. The destruction of infrastructure, coupled with the displacement of populations, plunges affected provinces into deeper poverty and underdevelopment, creating a vicious cycle that is difficult to break.

The economic costs of such conflicts are enormous. Provinces that were once economically prosperous, such as Karachi in Sindh or Quetta in Balochistan, can be plunged into poverty and underdevelopment due to prolonged conflict. This not only affects the provinces themselves but also has a ripple effect on the national economy, as key industries, trade routes, and resources are disrupted.

Workable Solutions and the Way Forward

Addressing inter-provincial conflicts in Pakistan requires a multi-faceted approach that involves political, economic, and social interventions.

1. Equitable Resource Distribution: The federal government must work towards ensuring equitable distribution of resources among the provinces. This could involve revisiting the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award to address the concerns of smaller provinces regarding revenue sharing and resource allocation. Transparent and fair mechanisms for resource distribution, particularly for water, gas, and minerals, are essential to reduce tensions.

2. Strengthening Federalism: A stronger federal structure that allows for greater autonomy and decision-making power at the provincial level can help address the political grievances of smaller provinces. Decentralization of power, coupled with greater control over local resources, can empower provinces to manage their own development and reduce dependence on the central government.

3. Promoting Dialogue and Reconciliation: Building trust among provinces through dialogue and reconciliation initiatives is crucial. The federal government, in collaboration with provincial leaders, should facilitate platforms for dialogue to address historical grievances and build consensus on contentious issues. This can help prevent conflicts from escalating and promote a sense of national unity.

4. Investing in Underdeveloped Regions: Targeted investments in underdeveloped regions, such as Balochistan and rural Sindh, can help address the root causes of conflict by reducing poverty and creating economic opportunities. Infrastructure development, education, and healthcare initiatives in these regions can improve the quality of life and reduce the appeal of insurgency and militancy.

5. Strengthening Judicial and Governance Mechanisms: Ensuring that disputes between provinces are resolved through legal and institutional mechanisms rather than through conflict is essential. Strengthening the role of the judiciary and governance institutions in mediating disputes can provide a peaceful and constructive way to address inter-provincial tensions.

6. Fostering Economic Integration: Promoting economic integration among provinces through the development of inter-provincial trade and investment opportunities can help build interdependence and reduce conflict. The development of shared infrastructure projects, such as transportation networks and industrial zones, can create mutual economic benefits and foster cooperation.

Conclusion

Inter-provincial conflicts in Pakistan present significant challenges to the country's economic development and national unity. However, with targeted interventions and a commitment to equitable governance, these conflicts can be managed and resolved. By addressing the root causes of resource distribution disputes, promoting political inclusion, and investing in underdeveloped regions, Pakistan can work towards a more harmonious and prosperous future for all its provinces. The path to resolution requires a combination of political will, economic reform, and social cohesion, but the potential rewards—stability, growth, and unity—are well worth the effort.

Please note that the views expressed in this article are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any organization.

Dr. Muhammad Khalid Bashir is an Associate Professor at the Institute of Agricultural and Resource Economics, and Co-Chair of Policy, Advocacy and Outreach at Pak-Korea Nutrition Center, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Related Stories