One Health Approach for Livestock in Pakistan

Explore the vital connection between livestock and rural families in Pakistan. Discover how a One Health approach can mitigate zoonotic disease risks, enhance public health, and improve livelihoods through livestock testing, vaccination, and community collaboration.

PUBLIC HEALTH ECONOMICS

Khuda e Nazar & Ehsan Ullah

8/17/2026

Orange card with "one" logo surrounded by other cards
Orange card with "one" logo surrounded by other cards

Before sunrise, the fields around Faisalabad are often wrapped in mist as farmers begin another day of tending their animals. For families like Rasheed Khan’s, livestock is not simply a source of milk or meat. A buffalo or cow can represent savings, school fees, household nutrition, and protection against a poor harvest. Yet the same close relationship that makes livestock so valuable can also create an invisible pathway for disease to move from animals to people.

Pakistan has more than 200 million livestock animals, and millions of rural households keep buffaloes, cattle, goats, and sheep close to their homes. Animals may share courtyards, water sources, feeding areas, and, particularly during winter, living spaces. This intimate human–animal interface creates ideal conditions for zoonotic diseases, infections that can naturally pass between animals and humans, to spread.

Brucellosis is a particularly important example. In livestock, the disease can cause abortions, retained placenta, infertility, reduced milk production, and other reproductive problems. These losses can gradually undermine household income, while farmers may attribute repeated reproductive failures to poor nutrition, bad luck, or weak animals rather than infection. The disease can therefore remain hidden within herds for years.

For humans, brucellosis can cause prolonged or recurring fever, joint and muscle pain, night sweats, weakness, and severe fatigue. Because these symptoms can resemble other common illnesses, patients may be misdiagnosed or receive inappropriate treatment. Farmers, livestock workers, veterinarians, milk handlers, and family members who consume unpasteurized dairy products or assist animals during difficult births can face particular exposure risks.

This is why animal health cannot be separated from human health. A sick animal may mean lost income for a household, but it can also represent a potential health threat to the entire family. Protecting rural communities therefore requires more treatment than treating patients after illness occurs. It requires vaccination and disease surveillance in livestock, safer animal-handling practices, improved veterinary services, milk hygiene, farmer education, and stronger coordination between veterinary and human-health systems.

The lesson is simple but powerful: the boundary between the livestock shed and the household is not a health barrier. Pakistan’s rural health strategy must recognize that healthier animals can mean healthier families, stronger livelihoods, and more resilient communities.

When One Disease Creates Two Health Crises

The real epidemiological challenge begins when the same disease appears in both the household and the livestock shed, yet neither side is investigated as part of the same problem. A physician treating a farmer or family member may never ask about sick animals, abortions, or unpasteurized milk. Likewise, a veterinarian treating infected livestock may never consider whether household members have developed similar symptoms. Two professionals may therefore treat two apparently unrelated cases while a single infection continues circulating between animals and people.

This is where the One Health approach becomes essential. Human health, animal health, and the surrounding environment are interconnected, particularly in rural communities where livestock live close to families. Doctors, veterinarians, laboratory specialists, agricultural extension workers, and public health officials need to share information, coordinate surveillance, and investigate disease patterns together. A village should be understood as one interconnected epidemiological system rather than as separate human and animal populations.

The economic consequences are substantial. An infected buffalo may experience abortion, infertility, reduced milk production, and prolonged loss of productivity. For a smallholder family, this can mean lost income, fewer nutritious foods, and increased financial vulnerability. At the community level, repeated livestock infections can reduce overall productivity and impose significant costs on farmers and the livestock sector.

Human illness adds another layer of loss. Prolonged fever, weakness, joint pain, repeated medical consultations, missed workdays, diagnostic expenses, and inappropriate treatment can place considerable pressure on household finances. When these losses are multiplied across thousands of households, a seemingly invisible disease becomes a significant economic burden.

The problem is further complicated by inappropriate antibiotic use. When zoonotic infections are misdiagnosed, patients or animals may receive antibiotics unnecessarily or receive the wrong drug, dose, or treatment duration. Such practices contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), making future infections more difficult and expensive to treat.

Drug-resistant organisms do not remain confined to farms. They can move through livestock, food, water, markets, and human contact, turning an animal-health problem into a wider public-health threat. Pakistan therefore needs stronger One Health surveillance, better diagnostic capacity, responsible antimicrobial use, and routine collaboration between veterinary and human-health systems. Prevention is not simply cheaper than treatment, it is essential for protecting both rural livelihoods and national health.

From Simple Farm Practices to a Stronger One Health System

Many of the most effective measures against zoonotic disease do not require expensive laboratories, sophisticated technology, or a major national policy overhaul. They begin with practical habits that farmers, veterinarians, extension workers, and public health professionals can adopt immediately. For smallholder households, testing breeding animals for brucellosis before introducing them into a herd is among the most valuable preventive measures. Early screening can reduce reproductive losses, protect herd productivity, and lower the risk of infection spreading to people.

Safe milk handling is equally important. Pasteurization, or simply boiling milk thoroughly at household level, can substantially reduce the risk of transmitting pathogens through raw milk. This inexpensive practice is particularly important in communities where families consume milk directly from their own animals. Similarly, wearing gloves when assisting with calving, handling aborted fetuses, or disposing of placental material can reduce exposure to infectious organisms. These materials may contain high concentrations of pathogens, making direct contact a significant occupational risk.

Vaccination also deserves greater attention. Where livestock vaccination programs are available, improving farmer awareness and access can provide an important layer of protection. Veterinary extension workers can play a critical role by explaining which animals should be vaccinated, when vaccination should occur, and why maintaining herd-level protection matters.

Perhaps the most important intervention, however, is communication. If a veterinarian observes an unusual cluster of abortions in livestock and a nearby health worker encounters several patients with prolonged, unexplained fever, the two observations should not remain in separate reporting systems. Sharing such information can provide an early warning of a common zoonotic threat. One Health becomes meaningful when information moves across professional boundaries.

This approach also creates an important learning opportunity for Pakistan's veterinary, medical, epidemiology, and public health students. A field visit should involve more than examining an animal or interviewing a patient in isolation. Students can ask about livestock illnesses, recent abortions, milk-handling practices, occupational exposure, household health, water sources, and animal movements. Such integrated observation can reveal connections that conventional surveys may miss.

The future of One Health in Pakistan will ultimately depend on this ability to connect seemingly separate pieces of information. A farmer's observations, a veterinarian's diagnosis, a health worker's case records, and a student's field notes can collectively provide a much clearer picture of disease transmission.

The boundaries separating human and animal health may exist within institutions, training programs, and administrative systems, but they rarely exist in rural households. People and animals share food, water, shelter, livelihoods, and environments. Protecting one therefore requires protecting the other. One Health is not simply a policy concept; it is a practical way of seeing rural life as an interconnected health system.

Conclusion

Pakistan’s close relationship between livestock and rural families creates both livelihood opportunities and zoonotic disease risks. Diseases such as brucellosis can reduce livestock productivity while threatening human health and household incomes. Simple measures including livestock testing and vaccination, safe milk handling, protective practices during animal care, farmer education, and responsible antibiotic use can significantly reduce these risks. The key is stronger collaboration between veterinarians, doctors, public health officials, extension workers, and communities. By adopting a One Health approach, Pakistan can connect animal and human health surveillance, improve early disease detection, and strengthen prevention. Ultimately, healthier animals mean healthier families, more secure livelihoods, and more resilient rural communities.

Please note that the views expressed in this article are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any organization.

The writers are affiliated with the Departments of Department of Epidemiology & Public Health; and Pathology, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan and can be reached at ahsanullahakhterzai@gmail.com

Related Stories

📬 Stay Connected

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive research updates, publication calls, and ambassador spotlights directly in your inbox.

🔒 We respect your privacy.

🧭 About Us

The Agricultural Economist is your weekly guide to the latest trends, research, and insights in food systems, climate resilience, rural transformation, and agri-policy.

🖋 Published by The AgEcon Frontiers (sPvt) Ltd. (TAEF) a knowledge-driven platform dedicated to advancing research, policy, and innovation in agricultural economics, food systems, environmental sustainability, and rural transformation. We connect scholars, practitioners, and policymakers to foster inclusive, evidence-based solutions for a resilient future.

The Agricultural Economist © 2024

All rights of 'The Agricultural Economist' are reserved with TAEF