Turks' Impact on Agriculture in Islamic Civilization

Explore the profound influence of Turks on agriculture within and beyond Islamic civilization. Discover how Turkic agro-pastoral expertise integrated with Islamic values led to innovative and sustainable agricultural systems across Eurasia.

RURAL INNOVATION

Mithat Direk

1/16/2026

white and green concrete building under white clouds during daytime
white and green concrete building under white clouds during daytime

The flourishing of Islamic civilization catalyzed profound advancements in agricultural science, ethics, and global food systems, rooted in a distinctive synthesis of religious principles, scientific inquiry, and socio-economic responsibility. A central driver of this progress was the integration of Islamic ethical frameworks with the extensive agro-pastoral knowledge of Turkic peoples following their widespread adoption of Islam. Turkic societies brought with them advanced skills in animal husbandry, seasonal mobility, irrigation management, and pasture governance, which, when aligned with Islamic norms of stewardship (khilāfah) and balance (mīzān), generated resilient and adaptive agricultural systems across Central Asia, Anatolia, the Middle East, and South Asia.

This fusion not only transformed agrarian practices within the Islamic world but also facilitated the diffusion of crops, irrigation techniques, and institutional innovations to Europe and beyond, leaving a lasting imprint on global agriculture (Watson, 1983). Islam introduced a paradigm shift in how nature, production, and consumption were conceptualized. The Qur’anic worldview framed land and water as trusts rather than commodities, placing moral constraints on exploitation and waste. Jurisprudential concepts such as halal (permissible) and haram (forbidden) reshaped food systems by regulating species consumption, prescribing hygienic slaughter practices, and mandating humane treatment of animals, thereby embedding ethics directly into agricultural value chains (Akgündüz, 2011). Equally important were prohibitions against hoarding, speculation, and unjust pricing, which sought to ensure food security and social equity, particularly during periods of scarcity.

While Islamic law recognized agriculture as a noble and lawful means of livelihood, it did not idealize profit maximization. Instead, agriculture was historically framed as a socially essential sector responsible for sustaining communities and stabilizing markets. Ottoman land and tax systems, for instance, prioritized continuity of cultivation and peasant welfare over extractive rents, reflecting a broader ethical economy rooted in justice (ʿadl) and public interest (maṣlaḥah) (İnalcık, 1973). Together, these principles fostered agricultural systems that were productive yet morally bounded, offering enduring lessons for contemporary debates on sustainable and equitable food systems.

Turks as Catalysts in the Islamic Agricultural Revolution

The integration of Turkic peoples into the Islamic world, particularly from the tenth century onward, played a catalytic role in strengthening, institutionalizing, and geographically diffusing agricultural innovation. Drawing on their deep experience in agro-pastoral systems, rangeland management, and water control across arid and semi-arid landscapes, Turkic societies enriched Islamic agriculture with practical knowledge that complemented existing scientific traditions. Under Seljuk and later Ottoman rule, this synthesis translated into the widespread adoption of landscape gardening traditions such as chahar bagh designs, reflecting both aesthetic and functional principles of water efficiency, microclimate regulation, and crop diversity. Advanced irrigation technologies including qanats, norias, and gravity-fed canal systems were refined and expanded, enabling stable agricultural production in water-scarce regions and facilitating the transmission of these techniques across the Mediterranean and into parts of Europe (Decker, 2009). Equally significant were improvements in post-harvest processing, storage, and urban food provisioning, which reduced losses, stabilized supplies, and supported expanding cities.

A defining moment in the formalization of this agricultural–commercial ecosystem was the promulgation of the Kanunname-i İhtisab-ı Bursa in 1502 under Sultan Bayezid II. This regulatory framework represented one of the earliest comprehensive systems of market governance and consumer protection in global history. It prescribed standardized measures of quality, weight, packaging, and pricing for essential goods ranging from bread, dairy products, and meat to vegetables and textiles, all overseen by the muhtasib as a public authority responsible for market integrity (Farodhi, 1984). By capping profit margins, often around ten percent, and enforcing seasonal price controls, the regulation sought to curb profiteering and shield consumers from scarcity-driven exploitation (Cosgel & Ergene, 2012).

Beyond economic regulation, these measures embedded ethical considerations directly into agricultural and commercial practice. Provisions governing humane animal transport, honest disclosure, and penalties for fraud reflected a moral economy rooted in Islamic jurisprudence. Importantly, the system balanced central oversight with decentralized governance, as standards were frequently shaped by local guilds and producers before state ratification. This pragmatic, participatory model contributed to market stability, social trust, and long-term agricultural sustainability across the Ottoman domains.

Turkic Foundations of Domestication and Agro-biodiversity

Long before their incorporation into the Islamic world, Turkic peoples played a foundational role in the domestication, improvement, and dissemination of crops and livestock that continue to underpin global food systems. Central Asia, historically shaped by Turkic and proto-Turkic communities, was identified by Nikolai Vavilov as one of the primary centers of origin for cultivated plants, characterized by exceptional genetic diversity and early human selection (Vavilov, 1992). This region’s varied ecology, spanning steppe, mountain, and oasis environments, enabled sustained experimentation with both farming and pastoral systems, fostering resilience and adaptability in food production.

Archaeobotanical and historical evidence confirms that Turkic societies were instrumental in refining and spreading major cereal crops such as wheat, barley, rye, and millet, which later formed the backbone of Eurasian agriculture. Their contributions extended to pulses including lentils, chickpeas, and peas, valued for their protein content and soil-enriching properties. Equally significant was their role in the domestication and improvement of fruit and nut species, apples, apricots, almonds, cherries, and grapes, many of which trace their genetic origins to Central Asian landscapes shaped by Turkic land use and trade networks (Janick, 2005). These crops gradually disseminated westward through migration, commerce, and imperial expansion, enriching agricultural diversity from Anatolia to Europe.

Animal domestication formed the second pillar of Turkic agro-biodiversity. The domestication of the horse on the Pontic–Caspian steppe around 3500 BCE, attributed to steppe cultures closely associated with proto-Turkic groups, revolutionized mobility, tillage, and long-distance exchange (Outram et al., 2009). Sheep, goats, and cattle were integral to Turkic pastoral economies, supporting mixed farming systems that balanced crop cultivation with livestock production.

Beyond domestication, Turkic communities advanced food preservation and processing techniques fermentation, drying, yogurt and cheese production, and durable meat products such as pastırma that enhanced food security across seasons. Over time, these biological and technological innovations were complemented by early systems of standardization and regulated markets, later formalized under Ottoman Kanunnames, linking agro-biodiversity with institutional stability and economic governance.

Contemporary Relevance

The contemporary relevance of Turkic contributions within Islamic civilization lies in their demonstration that agricultural sustainability is inseparable from ethical governance, technological ingenuity, and ecological restraint. At a time when global agri-food systems are under unprecedented stress, these historical lessons resonate with renewed urgency. Agriculture today accounts for more than 70 percent of global freshwater withdrawals and remains a leading driver of land degradation, deforestation, and biodiversity loss (FAO, 2021). These pressures are compounded by climate change, market concentration, and widening inequalities between producers and consumers, particularly in the Global South.

The Turkic–Islamic agricultural tradition offers a counter-narrative to extractive production models. Its emphasis on balance (mizan), stewardship (khalifa), and justice in exchange aligns closely with modern sustainability frameworks. Contemporary approaches such as regenerative agriculture, which prioritizes soil health, biodiversity, and water conservation, echo long-standing practices of mixed farming, rotational grazing, and landscape-sensitive cultivation historically practiced across Central Asia and Anatolia. Similarly, circular food systems that minimize waste and reintegrate by-products into production cycles reflect earlier norms of resource efficiency and communal accountability.

Ethical halal certification systems also draw upon this legacy, extending beyond ritual compliance to encompass animal welfare, fair labor practices, and environmental responsibility. This broader interpretation mirrors historical market regulations that limited profiteering, protected consumers, and enforced quality standards through institutional oversight. The 2023 UN Food Systems Summit reaffirmed that future food security depends on aligning production, processing, and distribution with ecological limits rather than overriding them through short-term technological fixes (UN, 2023).

Ultimately, the Turkic–Islamic agricultural legacy underscores that agriculture is not merely an economic sector but a moral and ecological covenant. Reintegrating ethics into food systems offers a pathway toward resilience, equity, and long-term sustainability in an increasingly fragile world.

Conclusion

The impact of Turks on agriculture within and beyond Islamic civilization was neither incidental nor purely technological, but deeply structural, ethical, and enduring. By integrating Turkic agro-pastoral expertise with Islamic moral and legal frameworks, a distinctive agricultural system emerged one that balanced productivity with stewardship, market recognition with social justice, and innovation with ecological restraint. From the domestication and diffusion of crops and livestock in Central Asia to the refinement of irrigation, food processing, and market regulation under Seljuk and Ottoman governance, Turkic societies played a pivotal role in shaping resilient agrarian systems across Eurasia.

Equally significant is the institutional legacy of this synthesis. Regulatory instruments such as the Ottoman kanunnames demonstrate that early food systems governance prioritized quality control, consumer protection, animal welfare, and price stability principles that remain central to contemporary debates on food security and sustainable markets. Rather than treating agriculture as a domain of unchecked accumulation, Turkic–Islamic traditions framed it as a social obligation tied to public welfare and ecological balance.

In the context of today’s global food crises marked by climate stress, resource depletion, and growing inequities, these historical insights acquire renewed relevance. They suggest that long-term agricultural sustainability cannot be achieved through technical fixes alone, but requires ethical governance, inclusive institutions, and respect for natural limits. The Turkic contribution to Islamic agriculture thus offers more than historical insight; it provides a normative and practical foundation for reimagining future food systems that are resilient, just, and ecologically grounded.

References: Akgündüz; Cosgel & Ergene; Decker; Farodhi; FAO; İnalcık; Janick; Outram et al; UN; Vavilov; Watson.

Please note that the views expressed in this article are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any organization.

The writer is affiliated with the Department of Agricultural Economics, Selcuk University, Konya-Türkiye and can be reached at mdirek@selcuk.edu.tr

Related Stories